Apex VIP FVG$69.99/mo Apex VIP Quant$69.99/mo Full Pack · best value$99.99/mo
Results Brokers Prop Firms Crypto Exchanges
Trading Journal Discounts Strategy VIP Signal Preview Quant Preview AutoQuant EA FAQ
INSTRUMENTS
EUR/USD FVG Research GBP/USD FVG Research USD/JPY FVG Research XAU/USD (Gold) FVG Research EUR/JPY FVG Research GBP/JPY FVG Research US30 (Dow) FVG Research US500 (S&P) FVG Research
Free Telegram Channel
Crypto Exchange Reviews● Figures dated per row9 EXCHANGES

MiCA-LICENSED
CRYPTO EXCHANGES

Nine exchanges checked against the ESMA CASP register, not against each other’s marketing. Every one of them is authorised — a venue missing from this table is missing on purpose. Each row names the legal entity that holds the licence — a global brand and its authorised European entity are not the same company, and only one of them is regulated where you live.

How this page is sourcedTwo evidence standards, stated plainly rather than blurred together. Authorisation data — entity, regulator, date, services — comes from the ESMA CASP register. Fee data comes from each exchange’s own published schedule. Where a figure could not be traced to a primary source, the cell says so instead of carrying an aggregator’s number. This section carries no referral links.

COMPARE ALL 9 EXCHANGES

Register-verified · re-check before you deposit · exchange names stay pinned while you scroll

SWIPE TO COMPARE →
ExchangeLegal entityRegulatorAuthorisedMiCA servicesTrading venueFee model
Kraken
CASP · 8/10 · ★3.2
Payward Europe Solutions LtdIE · Central Bank of Ireland25 Jun 20258 of 10Yes · 2nd entityTiered maker/taker — 0.40% / 0.80% at tier 1
Bitstamp
CASP · 7/10 · ★–
Bitstamp Europe S.A.LU · CSSF15 May 20257 of 10YesThree separate axes — standard, FX/stable, USDT
Bitvavo
CASP · 3/10 · ★4.1
Bitvavo B.V. · KvK 68743424NL · AFM26 Jun 20253 of 10YesTen-tier maker/taker on EUR markets
OKX
CASP · 9/10 · ★2.3
OKX Europe LimitedMT · MFSA27 Jan 20259 of 10YesVolume-tiered maker/taker
Gate
CASP · 6/10 · ★3.2
Gate Technology LimitedMT · MFSA29 Sep 20256 of 10YesVolume-tiered maker/taker
Coinbase
CASP · 7/10 · ★4.0
Coinbase Luxembourg S.A.LU · CSSF20 Jun 20257 of 10NoNot published per entity
Bybit
CASP · 5/10 · ★1.4
Bybit EU GmbHAT · FMA28 May 20255 of 10No0.25% maker / 0.10% taker — changing 5 Oct 2026
Crypto.com
CASP · 6/10 · ★1.8
Foris DAX MT LimitedMT · MFSA27 Jan 20256 of 10NoVolume tier × token holding
Bitpanda
CASP · 7/10 · ★4.1
Bitpanda GmbH · BP23 CA LimitedAT · FMA + MT · MFSA09 Apr 20257 of 10No · brokerSpread, not a commission

Authorisation fields from the ESMA CASP register. Fee models from each exchange’s own published schedule; asset counts, where shown, are indicative and dated. Fee models are shown rather than single rates because these nine price in several different ways — one “fees from” figure across them would be false. Verified 7 September 2026.

Trustpilot scores are read from each profile page on trustpilot.com: Kraken re-read 24 September 2026; Bitvavo, Coinbase and OKX captured 1 September 2026; Gate, Bybit EU, Crypto.com and Bitpanda captured 7 September 2026. Bybit EU’s score is the EU entity’s own profile (www.bybit.eu); every other score is the global brand profile, not the EU entity. Bitstamp is split across two profiles and is not scored here. Scores change daily — the date is the claim.

FOUR REGULATORY STATES

“Licensed” is not one condition — it is four, and only the first protects you

1 · Licensed, and serving youThe authorised entity is the one you are trading with. The nine exchanges in the top half of the table above. This is the only state in which MiCA client-asset protections actually reach you.
2 · Licensed — but the wrong entityThe group holds an authorisation, but the site you signed up to is not the entity that holds it. bybit.com is not bybit.eu. Coinbase’s non-EU affiliates are not Coinbase Luxembourg S.A. OKX makes this point in its own legal material: a licence held by the global entity does not protect an EU user.
3 · Licensed — but not serving youThe licence exists and is current, but the venue has withdrawn from your market anyway. A register entry proves authorisation, not availability.
4 · Not on the registerNo authorisation. A pending application is this state, not the first one: a firm that has filed with a national regulator and is waiting is still unauthorised today. Absence can also mean a regulator has named the firm on the ESMA warning list for providing services without authorisation. This page lists only venues that appear on the CASP register — a venue you do not find here has not been left out by oversight.

AUTHORISED · 9 EXCHANGES

On the ESMA CASP register, with the licence-holding entity named

Deepest fee ladder

Kraken

★★★★★3.4Trustpilot

Payward Europe Solutions Ltd holds the CASP authorisation from the Central Bank of Ireland, with an e-money licence in a second Irish entity. Spot fees run a twelve-tier maker/taker ladder and stablecoin pairs are priced on their own axis.

0.40%
Maker · tier 1
0.80%
Taker · tier 1
8/10
MiCA services
30
EEA markets
✓ Authorised in Ireland since June 2025 — LEI 254900641D8KNHUZYX24
✓ Twelve fee tiers; taker falls to 0.10% at $10M 30-day volume
✓ Stablecoin and FX pairs priced separately, from 0.20%
– Tier-1 taker at 0.80% is high — every aggregator we checked published 0.40%
– The trading-venue permission sits with a second entity, not the CASP
Our verdict on Kraken

Kraken is the clearest case for reading the fee schedule rather than a comparison site. Aggregators publish 0.25% / 0.40%; Kraken’s own schedule says 0.40% / 0.80% at tier 1 — double on the taker side. The ladder is genuinely deep, so high-volume traders land far below that, but the headline number most sites quote is not the one you pay on your first trade.

Only true EU venue

Bitstamp

–Trustpilot

One of only three exchanges here whose CASP authorisation actually includes operating a trading platform. Licence N00000003 from Luxembourg’s CSSF. Fees are priced on three independent axes rather than one ladder.

0.30%
Std maker · <$10k
0.030%
USDT maker
7/10
MiCA services
N00000003
CSSF licence
✓ Holds the operation-of-a-trading-platform permission, which most do not
✓ USDT pairs are roughly ten times cheaper than standard pairs
✓ Eleven volume tiers across three separate pricing axes
– Three fee axes make a single “fees from” figure meaningless — you must read the one for your pair
– Wordmark aside, the lowest brand recognition of the nine
Our verdict on Bitstamp

Bitstamp prices on three axes and no comparison site we checked reflected that. Standard pairs start at 0.30% / 0.40%, FX and stablecoin pairs at 0.060% / 0.080%, and USDT pairs at 0.030% / 0.040% — an order of magnitude apart. Which axis you are on matters far more than which tier.

Lowest entry fees

Bitvavo

★★★★★4.1Trustpilot

Amsterdam-based, authorised by the AFM under Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 — stated in their own footer. Holds the trading-platform permission. EUR is the only fiat rail.

0.15%
Maker · tier 1
0.25%
Taker · tier 1
3/10
MiCA services
EUR
Only fiat rail
✓ Lowest tier-1 fees of the nine at 0.15% / 0.25%
✓ Holds the trading-platform permission
✓ Offers margin on 21 assets — contrary to every source that calls it spot-only
– Only 3 of the 10 MiCA services — the narrowest authorisation here
– EUR only; no USD or GBP rail
Our verdict on Bitvavo

Bitvavo is the cheapest entry point of the nine and holds a real venue permission, but on the narrowest authorisation: three services against Kraken’s eight. Worth knowing that it does offer margin trading on 21 assets with a 2% liquidation threshold — the sources describing it as spot-only are wrong.

Widest authorisation

OKX

★★★★★2.3Trustpilot

Among the first CASP authorisations granted anywhere, in January 2025. Nine of the ten MiCA services including operation of a trading platform, plus a MiFID II licence and a Malta payment institution licence.

9/10
MiCA services
30
EEA markets
Monthly
Proof of reserves
54930069NLWEIGLHXU42
LEI
✓ Nine of ten MiCA services — the widest authorisation in this table
✓ Also holds MiFID II (Mar 2025) and a payment institution licence (Feb 2026)
✓ Monthly proof of reserves with independent cryptographic verification
✓ Passports into all 30 EEA states
– The global okx.com entity is not the licensed European one — check which you are on
Our verdict on OKX

OKX holds the broadest authorisation here and says something worth repeating in its own legal material: a licence held by the global entity does not protect an EU user. That is the same trap as bybit.com against bybit.eu, stated by an exchange about itself.

Newest authorisation

Gate

★★★★★3.2Trustpilot

Authorised in Malta in September 2025, LEI 984500D6A0F945BB5A15, passporting into 29 EU/EEA states. Also holds a payment institution licence under the Malta Financial Institutions Act.

6/10
MiCA services
29
EEA markets
Sep 2025
Authorised
PSD2
Also holds
✓ Holds the operation-of-a-trading-platform permission
✓ Payment institution licence under the Malta Financial Institutions Act
✓ Passports into 29 EU/EEA states
– The most recent authorisation here — the shortest track record under MiCA
– The register lists “Gate Technology Limited”, not the brand — a brand search returns nothing
Our verdict on Gate

Gate is on this page because of a correction. It was originally placed in the unlicensed tier on an assumption, and a register check moved it. The reason it looked unlicensed is instructive: the ESMA register records legal entity names, so searching “Gate.io” returns nothing and reads as an absence of authorisation.

Largest listed operator

Coinbase

★★★★★4.0Trustpilot

The EU entity is Coinbase Luxembourg S.A. under the CSSF, licence N00000004 — not the Irish entity most sources name. Authorised for exchange, execution and custody, but not to operate a trading venue.

7/10
MiCA services
N00000004
CSSF licence
No
Venue permission
—
Fees per entity
✓ Nasdaq-listed parent with published audited financials
✓ Seven of ten MiCA services under the CSSF
– Does not hold the trading-platform permission
– We could not verify EEA-entity fees from a primary source — two aggregators published conflicting figures and neither matched anything we could confirm
– Widely attributed to Ireland; the CASP entity is Luxembourg
Our verdict on Coinbase

Coinbase is the one exchange here whose fees we will not state. Two aggregators published different figures, neither traceable to a Coinbase page for the EEA entity, so the cell reads not published rather than picking one. The entity itself is also commonly reported wrong — it is Luxembourg, not Ireland.

Check the domain

Bybit

★★★★★1.4Trustpilot

Bybit EU GmbH holds the Austrian FMA authorisation, LEI 5299005V5GBSN2A4C303, passporting into 29 EU/EEA markets. EEA clients are served through bybit.eu, not the global bybit.com.

0.25%
Maker
0.10%
Taker
5/10
MiCA services
29
EEA markets
✓ Authorised by the Austrian FMA in May 2025
✓ Passports into 29 EU/EEA markets
– bybit.com is not the licensed European entity — bybit.eu is
– The published fee schedule changes on 5 October 2026; figures here are pre-change
– Does not hold the trading-platform permission
Our verdict on Bybit

The domain is the whole story here. bybit.eu is operated by Bybit EU GmbH and carries the MiCA authorisation; bybit.com does not. Note also that the fee schedule changes on 5 October 2026, so anything published before then — including this page — needs re-reading after that date.

Two-variable pricing

Crypto.com

★★★★★1.8Trustpilot

The EEA entity is Foris DAX MT Limited under the MFSA, authorised January 2025. Fees are not a flat rate: they are a function of 30-day volume and how much of the exchange’s own token you hold.

6/10
MiCA services
Jan 2025
Authorised
2
Fee variables
No
Venue permission
✓ Among the earliest CASP authorisations, January 2025
✓ Six of ten MiCA services under the MFSA
– Fees depend on token holdings as well as volume — no single rate exists
– Commonly published as a flat tier, which is not how it prices
– Does not hold the trading-platform permission
Our verdict on Crypto.com

Crypto.com cannot be reduced to a fee percentage, which is why this table shows a fee model rather than a number. Your rate is a function of two variables — 30-day volume and token holding — and sources publishing it as a flat tier are describing something that does not exist.

Broker, not an exchange

Bitpanda

★★★★★4.1Trustpilot

Two authorised entities: Bitpanda GmbH under the Austrian FMA and BP23 CA Limited under the MFSA. Bitpanda does not run an order book at all — it is a broker, and the cost is in the spread.

2
Authorised entities
7/10
MiCA services
Spread
Cost model
Apr 2025
Authorised
✓ Two separate CASP authorisations, Austria and Malta
✓ Simplest interface of the nine for a first purchase
– No order book — you cannot place a maker order, so maker/taker comparisons do not apply
– Cost sits in the spread and is harder to compare against commission-based venues
– Frequently listed with a percentage fee it does not charge
Our verdict on Bitpanda

Bitpanda is a broker, not an exchange, and that single fact makes most comparisons of it meaningless. There is no order book, so there is no maker or taker rate; you pay a spread. Any table showing Bitpanda with a percentage trading fee alongside Kraken and Bitstamp is comparing two different products.

⚠︎ RISK WARNING: Trading forex and CFDs carries significant risk. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The published stop-loss does not guarantee profits. Never trade money you cannot afford to lose. Trade To The Top provides signals for informational purposes only — not financial advice. © 2024–2026 TradeToTheTop.com